Archive for the ‘Pets and People’ Category

Traitor!

March 2, 2009
Ted Paul is approved by AKC to judge Collies,
Shetland Sheepdogs, Pembroke and
Cardigan Welsh Corgis, and Junior Handling.
He has not had a judging
assignment – specialty or all-breed – since
2007.
 
 
Recently, Ted and his wife very publicly aligned
themselves with and bequeathed their entire
estate to H$U$, the largest domestic animal
exterminationist 
animal “rights” group in the world. It would
seem that Mr. Paul is no longer interested in
future show judging assignments. All fanciers 
involved with Collies, Shelties, Corgis, and
Junior Showmen – the future of the purebred
dog fancy – should be made aware of Mr. Paul’s 
affiliations and now public agenda.
 
Those of us who cherish our pets, as well as
the rights of our future generations to enjoy
the human / animal bond in like manner, might
well be shocked and outraged by Mr. Paul’s
actions. How could anyone so involved with dogs
as to become an AKC-licensed judge support
H$U$, much less bequeath an entire and
apparently sizable estate to such an organization?
 
We must remember that courting dog world
insiders such as Mr. Paul is a political tactic often
used by the Aristas to garner publicity and confuse 
the uninitiated. The H$U$, already a multi-billion
dollar organization, is more likely interested in the
Pauls for their standing in the purebred dog fancy
than in the hefty estate holdings they may have to 
bequeath. Could it be that the already well-funded
H$U$ gave or promised the Pauls “an offer they
 couldn’t refuse” in exchange for the use of 
their names and personas as “generous donators”?
 
Whether the Pauls are merely victims of ARista
propaganda or strong arm tactics will likely never
be known to anyone but the Pauls themselves 
and a few key players in the AR movement.
What we do know, however, is that the H$U$ is
making a very public showing of having captured
people whom the purebred dog fancy has
considered “one of our own”.
 
AKC and the Collie Club of America now hold
the proverbial ball in their court.  We sincerely
hope, in the desperate interest of the protection 
and future of the purebred fancy, that both
organizations have progressed beyond the stage
of ignoring this kind of threat and hoping 
it will all just go away.
One thing we can promise: it won’t.
 
Therefore, we must address practical and
immediate steps to take.
 
What are the options for AKC and CCA?
 
What are the options for individuals who
participate and support the interests of AKC
and CCA?
 
What legal recourse is possible when a
prominent member publicly chooses to
identify with an institution dedicated
to exterminating purebred dogs?
What kinds of objections can AKC member
clubs and individual CCA members file to
protest continuing affiliation with and by
the Pauls?
 
What procedures do the clubs have to assert
their dissatisfaction with the Pauls’ stance?
 
If these organizations do not have provisions
for disassociating themselves from members
who proclaim allegiance to animal
extremist groups, it is time to initiate some.
 
It has already been widely stated on internet
chat groups and within smaller affiliated clubs
that Ted Paul should immediately be stripped
of his AKC judging license and ousted from
the CCA.
 
What suggestions and solutions do you propose?

Dog Owners’ Oprah Alert

April 2, 2008

by JOHN YATES
The American Sporting Dog Alliance

Dog owners might be in for another bashing on Friday, when ultra-liberal talk show host Oprah Winfrey does a special program on “puppy mills.” Winfrey’s star reporter, Lisa Ling, went undercover in commercial breeding kennels to do an expose on the pet store trade.

Although the commercial trade in pet store puppies has nothing to do with the vast majority of dog owners and breeders, sensationalistic news coverage tars us with the same brush. To the liberal animal rights mindset, all breeders are either “puppy mills” or “backyard breeders,” and this always translates into more laws that harm only the innocent. Moreover, the hidden agenda of the animal rights movement is the ultimate elimination of animal ownership, and their strategy is to pick us off one group at a time.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance (ASDA) does not know how Winfrey and Ling will approach the topic, but we are not optimistic that it will be a fair, balanced and reasonably objective report. Based on the normal biased reporting we see about dog breeding, and Winfrey’s close personal ties with animal rights groups, we would expect them to take their cameras into a couple of “worst case” kennels, and then by inference say or imply that all kennels and breeders are bad.

Expect to take a thumping from one of the wealthiest and most powerful animal rights activists on Earth. According to a report in Women’s Day magazine, billionaire Winfrey feels that leaving a cool $30 million to her own five dogs in her will is not even slightly extravagant. Inflation, you know.

Winfrey was partners with the radical Humane Society of the United States in a movement aimed at destroying cattle ranching because of alleged food safety issues from eating beef, and they were codefendants in a lawsuit brought by the industry.

This month, Winfrey has been giving serious consideration to an invitation to appear in nude photographs sponsored by one of the most extreme animal rights groups in America, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, pop tabloids report. The nude photos would be for PETA’s “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” campaign. Winfrey’s concern reportedly is not about endorsing PETA. The tabloids report that she is worried that nude photos might offend voters and harm the presidential campaign of Barrack Obama, whom she has strongly endorsed.

On Friday, we can expect a thumping with no opportunity to defend ourselves. The Winfrey/Ling style of journalism is to exploit highly emotional topics and sensationalize them to twang the heartstrings of a predominantly middle class audience of liberals who are looking for the next “do-gooder” cause to embrace. It looks like saving the whales or feeding starving people in Somalia aren’t fashionable this year. Pity the poor whales. Pity the poor Somali refugees.

And pity the poor dog owners! A campaign against dog owners and breeders has become the latest fashionable cause for the glitz and glitter crowd of celebrities.

The question is, what are we going to do about it?

For myself, I’m just plain sick and tired of being unfairly bashed. I guess I just wasn’t raised to be a punching bag.

But, you might be asking, how can we fight back against the wealthiest and most powerful media mogul in America? How can we fight that kind of power? How can we fight someone who wills $30 million to her dogs when we’re trying to figure out how to pay last month’s electric bill?

 I think we can do it, if we get off of our butts and actually do it. There are hundreds of thousands of people who breed dogs because they love them – show dogs, performing dogs, hunting dogs, obedience dogs, field trial dogs, companion dogs and just plain dogs. In addition, there are millions of dog owners who love their animals and thank breeders for doing the fine job that they know we do in improving temperament, genetic soundness, utility, beauty and health.

If we join together in this, we can be a formidable force.

My thoughts are that a boycott of Winfrey’s advertisers would be the most effective strategy. If several hundred thousand dog owners and breeders were to contact advertisers on the Oprah show and refuse to buy any of their products, they would be forced to take notice.

Please understand that I am not talking about censoring Winfrey’s opinions. I would fight for her right to express any opinion she chooses, and also for her right to present and endorse the views of animal rights groups on her program.

However, journalistic ethics demands fairness, balance and objectivity if programming purports to be reporting the news. If Oprah wants to do a report on dog breeding, that’s fine. But the report should be fair to us and give us the opportunity to balance the views of the animal rights groups with our side of the story.

I don’t expect that Oprah will hold to the same standard of ethics that I did as a newspaper reporter. I expect that her report will be a hatchet job on dog owners and breeders. The promotional blog for Friday’s Oprah Show gives us an idea of what we can expect: http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/44908. Read it for yourself.

A boycott of advertisers just might convince Oprah to undergo an ethical reformation. Most of her advertisers won’t like the idea of losing several hundred thousand customers so that Oprah can preach sermons against dog owners and breeders.

When I worked on newspapers, there was a cynical wisecrack that my bosses sometimes told me when they didn’t like something I wrote. “There is freedom of the press in America – for anyone who owns a press.” That meant I didn’t own the press.

It takes a lot of money to own a TV show. Oprah has that kind of money, and she earned it, but it has gone to her head. Now she sneers at the rights and lives of ordinary people who made her a pop star, and that includes dog owners and breeders.

The Internet is the great equalizer. One of the beauties of the Internet is that it allows everyone to truly have the rights of free speech and free press. The Internet has become the printing press of ordinary people, and now it reaches a reported 80-percent of American households.

Television represents the past, when Oprah’s kind of money and power controlled the right of a free press. The Internet has given us our voice.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance is asking all dog owners and breeders to watch the Oprah Show on Friday and form your own opinions. Then, if she does the kind of hatchet job we expect, please bombard her with emails expressing your displeasure.

Then,  we need to get organized for a campaign to reach her advertisers. In order to get ready, ASDA is asking readers of this report to email us a list of every advertiser that supports the Oprah Show. ASDA is willing to organize this campaign. Also, please let us know if you are able to help with it. Our email address is asda@csonline.net.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance works at the grassroots to defend the rights of dog owners and professionals against the very real threats of animal rights activism. Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. We maintain strict independence and are supported only by the voluntary donations of our members.

While the Oprah segment may be about “puppy mills,” the laws that her friends in PETA and HSUS are proposing really are targeting dog owners and hobby breeders, with the goal of reducing and ultimately eliminating animal ownership. These same radical groups also want to eliminate hunting, ban the ownership of firearms, forcibly convert us to vegan vegetarianism and destroy American farming traditions.

“Puppy mills” are not the issue. Existing federal, state and animal cruelty laws already intensively regulate commercial kennels. You are the issue. These groups want to destroy the things that you love and believe in.

Does Oprah have a conscience? She is leaving $30 million to support five dogs that she loves and apparently believes she is doing something right by supporting animal rights groups.

But she is being suckered. She is supporting groups that believe that the only unexploited dog is a dead dog. The truth is that PETA slaughters 97-percent of the dogs that enter the organization’s “shelter” in Virginia. They would rather kill those dogs than help them find a loving home.

Please forward this posting to as many people as you can, and also cross-post it on message boards. We need to reach as many people as possible quickly.

“Lassie Kills Chickens”

November 2, 2007

Do you remember hearing that?
Years ago, some “other breed” people who were jealous
of the Collie’s longstanding popularity began putting
out press saying that “the real dog” Lassie was not such
a likeable animal.  Of course, their intentions backfired
on them, with some people being pleased to think that
“Lassie” behaved a lot like their own dogs, after all, and
others being completely defensive of their much loved
“in the flesh” icon.  Lassie didn’t lose any popularity over
the allegation, and in the end, probably gained some.
 
Now we have a pair of disgruntled former associates of
Bob Weatherwax attempting the same sort of thing, only
today it’s on the internet.  They’ve even managed to
dig up an estranged  family member to parade around
in their effort to “show the world” that Bob kills chickens,
and not only that, he’s also part of a dysfunctional family!
Well, if the whole world and the whole society of Lassie
fans can’t relate to that, it is that revelation itself that will  
prove to be shocking!  Imagine, Bob Weatherwax is a
human being, and his dog, Laddie, is a real dog!  Not evil
enough for you?  Oh don’t worry, these two will embellish
until the cows come home….  on blog sites, on Yahoo lists,
on “Comments” made to any internet news group that
publishes a story about Bob, Bob and Laddie, or – to really
get them going – the Weatherwax Lassie dogs!
 
While all of this is the usual stuff of “wannabe” jealously
and questionable mental stability, it is still somewhat
disturbing to witness.  In this case, particularly, it
becomes unsettling when you realize the victim is a
sixty six year old man who, throughout his lifetime
has stuck with his father’s commitment to a dog, and
to a family of dogs that represent an international icon. 
Now, how many sixty six year old men can say that?
Equally disturbing is the fact that behind the smear
campaign is an association with a
multi billion dollar corporation that would like nothing
better than to separate that icon from all association
with the father and son, and the very real dogs they
judiciously bred, trained, lived with, and yes, loved.
 
My guess is the world doesn’t want the corporate icon
if it’s not associated with the Weatherwax Lassie Dogs. 
Anyone can draw a cartoon of a collie with a big white
collar and a blaze on it’s face, and there you have the
corporate icon.  Or you can make a movie or produce a
TV show around a collie, call the dog “Lassie”, and
there again you have the corporate icon (as has been
done).  You can even take a collie Bob Weatherwax
gave to someone he thought was a friend and declare
it to be “The Real Lassie”,  and once again, all you have
is the corporate icon.
 
Real men, father and son, neither of them perfect;
and real dogs, nine generations of them, father to son,
and none of them perfect either, are what comprise
the public’s view of “The Real Lassie”.  We see them
as united parts of the whole, and not to be disassociated
by either big corporation or disgruntled former fans.
We will take them, flaws and all, thank you.  Besides,
if you ask a fan, they will tell you it’s the disgruntled
wannabes who have the skeletons in the closet. and the
corporate Lassie who kills chickens!

(Click “Comments” below and leave yours - Thanks!)