Dog Owners’ Oprah Alert

By topotheday

by JOHN YATES
The American Sporting Dog Alliance

Dog owners might be in for another bashing on Friday, when ultra-liberal talk show host Oprah Winfrey does a special program on “puppy mills.” Winfrey’s star reporter, Lisa Ling, went undercover in commercial breeding kennels to do an expose on the pet store trade.

Although the commercial trade in pet store puppies has nothing to do with the vast majority of dog owners and breeders, sensationalistic news coverage tars us with the same brush. To the liberal animal rights mindset, all breeders are either “puppy mills” or “backyard breeders,” and this always translates into more laws that harm only the innocent. Moreover, the hidden agenda of the animal rights movement is the ultimate elimination of animal ownership, and their strategy is to pick us off one group at a time.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance (ASDA) does not know how Winfrey and Ling will approach the topic, but we are not optimistic that it will be a fair, balanced and reasonably objective report. Based on the normal biased reporting we see about dog breeding, and Winfrey’s close personal ties with animal rights groups, we would expect them to take their cameras into a couple of “worst case” kennels, and then by inference say or imply that all kennels and breeders are bad.

Expect to take a thumping from one of the wealthiest and most powerful animal rights activists on Earth. According to a report in Women’s Day magazine, billionaire Winfrey feels that leaving a cool $30 million to her own five dogs in her will is not even slightly extravagant. Inflation, you know.

Winfrey was partners with the radical Humane Society of the United States in a movement aimed at destroying cattle ranching because of alleged food safety issues from eating beef, and they were codefendants in a lawsuit brought by the industry.

This month, Winfrey has been giving serious consideration to an invitation to appear in nude photographs sponsored by one of the most extreme animal rights groups in America, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, pop tabloids report. The nude photos would be for PETA’s “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” campaign. Winfrey’s concern reportedly is not about endorsing PETA. The tabloids report that she is worried that nude photos might offend voters and harm the presidential campaign of Barrack Obama, whom she has strongly endorsed.

On Friday, we can expect a thumping with no opportunity to defend ourselves. The Winfrey/Ling style of journalism is to exploit highly emotional topics and sensationalize them to twang the heartstrings of a predominantly middle class audience of liberals who are looking for the next “do-gooder” cause to embrace. It looks like saving the whales or feeding starving people in Somalia aren’t fashionable this year. Pity the poor whales. Pity the poor Somali refugees.

And pity the poor dog owners! A campaign against dog owners and breeders has become the latest fashionable cause for the glitz and glitter crowd of celebrities.

The question is, what are we going to do about it?

For myself, I’m just plain sick and tired of being unfairly bashed. I guess I just wasn’t raised to be a punching bag.

But, you might be asking, how can we fight back against the wealthiest and most powerful media mogul in America? How can we fight that kind of power? How can we fight someone who wills $30 million to her dogs when we’re trying to figure out how to pay last month’s electric bill?

 I think we can do it, if we get off of our butts and actually do it. There are hundreds of thousands of people who breed dogs because they love them – show dogs, performing dogs, hunting dogs, obedience dogs, field trial dogs, companion dogs and just plain dogs. In addition, there are millions of dog owners who love their animals and thank breeders for doing the fine job that they know we do in improving temperament, genetic soundness, utility, beauty and health.

If we join together in this, we can be a formidable force.

My thoughts are that a boycott of Winfrey’s advertisers would be the most effective strategy. If several hundred thousand dog owners and breeders were to contact advertisers on the Oprah show and refuse to buy any of their products, they would be forced to take notice.

Please understand that I am not talking about censoring Winfrey’s opinions. I would fight for her right to express any opinion she chooses, and also for her right to present and endorse the views of animal rights groups on her program.

However, journalistic ethics demands fairness, balance and objectivity if programming purports to be reporting the news. If Oprah wants to do a report on dog breeding, that’s fine. But the report should be fair to us and give us the opportunity to balance the views of the animal rights groups with our side of the story.

I don’t expect that Oprah will hold to the same standard of ethics that I did as a newspaper reporter. I expect that her report will be a hatchet job on dog owners and breeders. The promotional blog for Friday’s Oprah Show gives us an idea of what we can expect: http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/44908. Read it for yourself.

A boycott of advertisers just might convince Oprah to undergo an ethical reformation. Most of her advertisers won’t like the idea of losing several hundred thousand customers so that Oprah can preach sermons against dog owners and breeders.

When I worked on newspapers, there was a cynical wisecrack that my bosses sometimes told me when they didn’t like something I wrote. “There is freedom of the press in America – for anyone who owns a press.” That meant I didn’t own the press.

It takes a lot of money to own a TV show. Oprah has that kind of money, and she earned it, but it has gone to her head. Now she sneers at the rights and lives of ordinary people who made her a pop star, and that includes dog owners and breeders.

The Internet is the great equalizer. One of the beauties of the Internet is that it allows everyone to truly have the rights of free speech and free press. The Internet has become the printing press of ordinary people, and now it reaches a reported 80-percent of American households.

Television represents the past, when Oprah’s kind of money and power controlled the right of a free press. The Internet has given us our voice.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance is asking all dog owners and breeders to watch the Oprah Show on Friday and form your own opinions. Then, if she does the kind of hatchet job we expect, please bombard her with emails expressing your displeasure.

Then,  we need to get organized for a campaign to reach her advertisers. In order to get ready, ASDA is asking readers of this report to email us a list of every advertiser that supports the Oprah Show. ASDA is willing to organize this campaign. Also, please let us know if you are able to help with it. Our email address is asda@csonline.net.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance works at the grassroots to defend the rights of dog owners and professionals against the very real threats of animal rights activism. Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. We maintain strict independence and are supported only by the voluntary donations of our members.

While the Oprah segment may be about “puppy mills,” the laws that her friends in PETA and HSUS are proposing really are targeting dog owners and hobby breeders, with the goal of reducing and ultimately eliminating animal ownership. These same radical groups also want to eliminate hunting, ban the ownership of firearms, forcibly convert us to vegan vegetarianism and destroy American farming traditions.

“Puppy mills” are not the issue. Existing federal, state and animal cruelty laws already intensively regulate commercial kennels. You are the issue. These groups want to destroy the things that you love and believe in.

Does Oprah have a conscience? She is leaving $30 million to support five dogs that she loves and apparently believes she is doing something right by supporting animal rights groups.

But she is being suckered. She is supporting groups that believe that the only unexploited dog is a dead dog. The truth is that PETA slaughters 97-percent of the dogs that enter the organization’s “shelter” in Virginia. They would rather kill those dogs than help them find a loving home.

Please forward this posting to as many people as you can, and also cross-post it on message boards. We need to reach as many people as possible quickly.

Tags: , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Dog Owners’ Oprah Alert”

  1. slt Says:

    Here is a slideshow of Oprah buying her three Golden Retriever pups from a puppy farm type facility. There is a video link at the bottom of the page as well titled “Who can resist those puppy eyes?”

    http://www.oprah.com/tows/slide/200509/20050919/slide_20050919_350_201.jhtml

  2. anthony Says:

    I agree that Peta and alot of other organizations misrepresent themselves. But its also an example of the vocal few who get alot of attention. As a dog owner trainer and volunteer for rescued bulldogs I hate to see people that say they are for animals and secretly have an agenda that does not only put dogs down but attacks others who try to help find good homes for dogs.

  3. Joy Says:

    Oprah Winfrey is scary. I inadvertantly watched a few minutes of her show a couple of years ago. She was cuddling an audience member who was in tears, talking about her medical bills and other tragedies. Ms W. looked her in the face and said, “You know what I’m going to do for you?”
    Of course the whole studio went dead silent in expectation of some bill paying blessing from the multi billionairre. (She milked it, too). Finally she stated, “I’m going to pray for you; and I don’t want you to think it’s the same when I say that as when other people say that, because MY prayers get action!” I nearly barfed on my remote control! It was the last time I ever allowed my TV to get “stuck” on that station! I guess she never heard about the camel going thru the eye of the needle more easily than the pompous rich getting into heaven…. or maybe she just figures she can buy a bigger needle and fool God. (Just like she fools so many people).

  4. Claudia Says:

    i agree in part with what you say–but–I have a problem with hunting dogs–if a pet owners’s dog attacks a raccoon–he has to be put down or quaranteened for months-(even if they have all shots) -in case the raccoon is rabid–However there are hunters–whose dogs go “coon hunting” every night–I would like to know where the line is drawn–don’t hunting dogs need to adhere to the same standards as pet dogs. Just something that I have never figured out. would appreciate an explanation if you have one.

    Hey Claudia — I think your comment is on another post, but I will respond for you anyway. My understanding is that coon hunters take the dogs out to chase and tree the raccoon. The dogs don’t actually tangle with the raccoon, they just chase it up a tree, where it is then shot by the hunter. Thanks for visiting. — Bram

  5. Reality Check Says:

    Shows over and I have to ask. Expose on what???? Except for one puppy, evidence was brief and blurred with vocal descriptions of their conditions lending shock value to enhance the imagination. As Lenin once said, “a lie told often enough becomes the truth.” Having guests support those lies with “maybe’s”, “probably”, “could haves” and “I believe” and watching message boards spout these “maybe’s”, probablies”, “could haves” and “I believes” as fact, shows the dumbing down of humanity. Had Oprah truly wanted to address this issue, hard core facts would have been presented instead of her emotional side and the unsubstantiated comments of Wayne Pacelle and Dr. Rubin.

  6. jill Says:

    I wasn’t the least bit offended by the Oprah show you reference. Oprah has a huge following and if one more pet owner out there decided to get their dog spayed or neutured, or decided to think more carefully about where they buy their next pet, then all the better. I suppose she could have done more to differentiate the responsible breeder from the greedy mill owner, but sum total I think she made people think more about taking responsbility for their pets. Isn’t this the point? Raising awareness about the treatment of animals. If you’re treating your animals well, then why be offended by Oprah ?

  7. Phil Says:

    Reply To Jill who “wasn’t offended”:

    No dear, you were not “supposed” to be offended by it.
    You are not “supposed” to understand that the ARista
    attack on “puppy mills” has anything whatsoever to do
    with you – with us – with reputable dog breeders,
    and owners, with the takeover of a society, or the
    extermination of,
    among others,
    all domestic animals.
    This is their long established Method of Operation;
    what law enforcement refers to as a perpetrator’s
    “M.O.” They say something you “have to” agree with
    to get you on their side while they dig your grave – like
    talking about the horrible clubbing of baby seals when
    we know they don’t give a DAMN about baby seals.
    Well, dear, I’m here to tell you that they don’t give a DAMN
    about you and your “responsible pet ownership” either!
    You are “supposed” to think, “Well, good! Finally
    our beloved champion of the soccer moms, Oprah Winfrey,
    is exposing those horrible puppy mill people and as a reputable
    breeder (or dog owner) I am happy to see this.” You are not
    “supposed” to see it as anything more – anything sinister,
    subversive, or anything that is part of a much bigger picture.
    As a reputable breeder or owner, you are not “supposed” to feel
    that you are being targeted here; carefully, systematically,
    and with fully evil intent. It’s all “supposed” to be about
    “the bad guys” — Not about controlling a society, eliminating
    civil rights or eliminating domestic animals. You’re “supposed”
    to agree with the idea of eliminating “just the bad guys”
    and you’re doing just as you’re “supposed” to do. Congratulations!
    The ARistas are very proud of you, indeed. They are also very
    proud of Oprah….. who’s eyes visibly glazed over (yes, look at
    the video!) when the folks associated with the mind control group
    (yes, look at their history!) began to speak…..
    Oh, sorry, I was not “supposed” to notice that, was I??
    My bad……

    Does this sound “far fetched” to you? I only wish it were!
    That’s another part of the ARista M.O. — pretend those who
    expose you are just nutty. Most people won’t bother to do
    the research so you can continue to deceive them…
    Do some research and be prepared to become VERY afraid!

    Let me tell you something; If you were aware of how many
    people in the U.S. today – not “puppy mill” people, but nice folks like
    you who are taking good and decent care of their animals – have
    been RAIDED and had their beloved pets CONFISCATED
    and KILLED by groups affiliated with the HSUS in the
    past five years, you would be HORRIFIED. — and this is only
    PART of the reason you should be OFFENDED BY OPRAH!
    The more they set legal precidents for this type of behavior,
    the more power they snatch — and the more rights you and
    I lose….. John Yates is no uninformed fool spouting casual opinions.
    Please get informed before you have REASON to be
    offended in your OWN home by the loss of your OWN animals
    (and are left wondering “What Happened?”!!!)

Leave a Reply